
Press Statement
By
Bradley B Roberts
National Chairman
Progressive Liberal Party
March 7th 2010
Nassau Bahamas
Kenyatta Gibson & Reece Chipman Scandals
Last
Sunday, I exposed the abuse of the public purse by the awarding of a
Government operational audit at The Bahamas Mortgage Corporation to a
company headed by Reece Dean Chipman of Catsan & Chipman Limited.
Mr. Chipman was the unsuccessful FNM candidate for St. Thomas More in the last general election.
He
is also the President of The Bahamas Institute of Chartered
Accountants, the statutory body which regulates the accounting
profession in The Bahamas.
My
statement disclosed that Mr. Chipman's firm was awarded a contract
although that firm submitted the highest bid to perform an operational
audit for The Bahamas Mortgage Corporation, of which Mr. Kenyatta
Gibson currently serves as its Chairman.
More experienced, less costly accounting firms that have
international
affiliations such as Ernst & Young, KPMG, Deloitte and Gomez Baker
Tilly, to mention a few, were overlooked by the Corporation, although
their bids were lower, and in some cases considerably lower than the
bid that was submitted by Catsan & Chipman Limited.
Mr.
Chipman's firm submitted a bid of $152,000 -- the highest of all bids
and Baker Tilly Gomez submitted the lowest bid for slightly more than
one-third that amount of $57,500.
Kenyatta
Gibson's initial response was that this represents "the kind of
low-minded politics that one comes to expect from Bradley Roberts.
He
continuously contorts and twists the truth to suit his political ends."
The Bahamas Mortgage Corporation sought to justify the award on the
basis that Mr. Chipman’s Firm was going to do more extra work and had
agreed to cap their fees.
Nine Firms were invited and from all of the responses only two did not give a specific amount.
All except theses two firms responded with a fixed fee which itself was the cap. The
other two had a range but in each instant the maximum of rage quoted
was far less that the contract price awarded to Catsan. With respect to
the suggestion that Mr. Chipman somehow was prepared to do more work
could only be relevant if somehow Mr. Chipman was responding to a
different RFP.
It
is very interesting that Mr. Gibson did not address the issue at hand
which was the award of a grossly inflated contract to an FNM crony, but
rather Kenyatta Gibson preferred to attack the messenger.
He did not deny my claim that this travesty under his chairmanship equates to "a scandalous abuse of the public purse."
Never once did Mr. Gibson refute that point. Is it because he cannot?
Surely
Mr. Gibson does not believe that it is "low-minded politics" to bring
to the attention of the public the waste of public funds or the abuse
of the public bidding process because I exposed Gibson and Chipman for
what they truly are, namely persons who colluded to engage in "milking
the taxpayer" while also engaging in a conflict of interest in order to
personally benefit from public funds.
This is shameful and disgraceful.
It
might seem to be strange that Mr. Gibson would respond in such a
bellicose manner but then when one considers that Kenyatta Gibson is
also a business partner of Reece Chipman, then Kenyatta Gibson's
vociferous responses become more understandable.
There
can be no denying of the fact that to the extent that Reece Chipman and
Kenyatta Gibson are in any sort of partnership raises a legitimate
concern about an actual or perceived conflict of interest arising from
their common business relationship.
I
take no particular pleasure in bringing to Prime Minister’s attention
and that of the Bahamian public that Kenyatta M Gibson and Reece Dean
Chipman have been partners in Braxton Wheels Limited which was
incorporated on June 17th 2003. The Register Number of the
Company is 50,759. The share capital was $5,000.00. The last returns
showed that Kenyatta M Gibson holds 3,000 shares and is listed as
President and Chairman of the Board of Directors and Reece Dean Chipman
holds 2,000 shares and is listed as Managing Director and
Vice-President. I am advised that Braxton Wheels Limited is in the
business of wheel chair and baby stroller rentals at Paradise Island.
Reece
Chipman trading under the name TABS has a contract with the DOEHS for
Curb Side Cleaning on Kemp Road in the St. Thomas Moore Constituency at
a monthly fee of $4,000.00. Reece Chipman also has a $4,000.00 per
month cleaning contract for the St. George’s Park off Mackey Street in
the vicinity of the headquarters of the FNM.
But then, we should not be surprised by Mr. Reece's penchant for conflicts of interest.
He
recently negotiated the lease for shared premises and expenses for both
his accounting firm and The Bahamas Institute of Chartered Accountants
(BICA) at Maritime House on Frederick Street, effectively tying the
future of the BICA to that of his firm.
And I am advised
that he executed that lease before formally obtaining the approval of
the BICA through the normally established protocols.
It is now clear that the voters of St. Thomas More saw through his veneer when he sought their support some three years ago.
In
addition, the question that must be asked is why did the Mortgage
Corporation select the accounting firm with the highest bid for work
that could have been performed by other, more reputable and more
experienced accounting firms?
It is fair to ask whether
Mr. Chipman's firm has the professional expertise, capacity and the
manpower to effectively conduct and complete this engagement as do the
other firms that submitted bids for this engagement.
The
nasty personal and untruthful attack on me in the House of Assembly on
Thursday evening past by Kenyatta Gibson together with the ramblings of
his Minister Kenneth Russell have sent a clear message that I have
touched a raw nerve. I decided to dig further and hence my disclosure
today.
Reece Chipman is a sole practitioner yet he practices in the name of Catsan Chipman Limited.
There are several things wrong with this picture.
(1)
The
Bahamas Institute of Chartered Accountants (BICA's) Rules of
Professional Conduct (RofPC) specifically states in Rule 19 under the
heading
Description of Public Practice, that "No person shall engage in public practice under a name or style which is misleading as to the nature of the practice.
The
practice of public accounting should be carried on under the
descriptive style of "Public Accountant(s) or "Chartered Accountants"
in the case of those persons who are
also members of the Institute". This means that only members of BICA can hold themselves out as "Public" or "Chartered Accountants."
I
have checked the membership list of the BICA and there is no such
member by the name of Catsan. Neither Kenyatta Gibson nor Minister
Russell has advised the pubic whether Mr. Chipman’s Firm is even
designated under BICA Rules of professional conduct to be a Firm of
Public Accountants or Chartered Accountants. It is worthy of note that
Mr. Reece Chipman is reported in the media to be associated with a
Company by the name of
NASTAC which teaches persons about the stock market and securities and that is the name CATSAN spelled backwards.
The upshot of this is that The Bahamas Mortgage Corporation has NOT awarded the engagement to a firm of Chartered Accountants.
(2)
I
have visited the web-site of Catsan & Chipman and observed that
besides Mr. Chipman there is only one CPA listed. It begs the question
as to how many persons Catsan & Chipman Limited employs and whether
or not this firm is able to competently conduct this engagement.
How many other engagements of this type and scope has Mr. Chipman’s firm completed?
(3)
Did
Catsan & Chipman meet privately with the Chair of the audit
committee chair before being awarded the engagement? If in the
affirmative were the other firms who submitted bids given the same
opportunity?
(4)
BICA's RofPC number 4 speaks to this under the heading of
"Independence and Objectivity"
and states that "Every accountant engaged in public practice must be
free of any influence, interest, relationship which, in respect of an
audit or review engagements, impairs or appears to impair the
professional judgment or objectivity of the accountant."
If
this engagement constitutes a significant part of the Firm's income,
there will be a question of that accountant's independence.
Kenneth
Russell MP, the Minister of Housing with the responsibility for the
Mortgage Corporation told the House of Assembly that he never met Reece
Chipman.
How can that be? Mr. Chipman was a candidate for
the FNM in the last general election. Is it logical or conceivable that
candidates on the same party ticket never meet each other during the
campaign?
Can Minister Kenneth Russell, Minister Earl
Deveaux and Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham explain to the Bahamian
people the logic and the justification in giving cleaning contracts to
a former FNM candidate who is Certified Public Accountant and President
of the Bahamas Institute Chartered Accountants?
These
are pressing questions that we call on the Prime Minister to answer in
the spirit of transparency and accountability which he often says is
the hallmark of his administration.
The
question must now be asked: just whose hand was caught in the cookie
jar or should in say caught in the plunder of the Public Treasury this
time?
I
have noted with a great deal of interest that the Prime Minister has
failed to respond to the very serious strong charges of wasteful
expenditure, disgraceful abuses and blatant nepotism in award of
contracts to the then cousin of the Minister of the National Insurance
Board when Minister Kenneth Russell held portfolio responsibility. The
Prime Minister must without further delay respond to these important
pressing issues.
I
now call on the Prime Minister to inform the Bahamian people what he
will do about the contract that has been awarded to Catsan and Chipman
in light of these revelations that Mr. Chipman and Mr. Gibson are
business partners in another venture.
I also call on the
Prime Minister to inform the Bahamian people what he will do about Mr.
Kenyatta Gibson in his capacity as Chairman of The Bahamas Mortgage
Corporation because of the conflict of interests that has resulted from
his business relationship with Mr. Chipman, and further how his
Government can justify awarding the Mortgage Corporation contract to
Chipman's firm both in light of the aforesaid conflict of interest and
because of the disparate costs that have been submitted by other more
reputable, experienced and qualified accounting firms for such services.