Dear Editor:
Last
evening the Prime Minister set out the government’s plan for what he
called “The transformation and modernization of New Providence”. It is
evident that the Prime Minister believes that such objective is achieved
through the expansion of existing roads and building brand new roads.
We disagree.
Perhaps
most importantly, we do not believe that New Providence can be
modernized without dramatically improving public transportation. That
will only happen when sufficient and adequate bus depots are
established, when buses are upgraded and when there is a consolidation
of the system. New Providence is simply not large enough to build roads
that would assure us of improved traffic flow. However, when fully
operational an improved public transportation system would reduce fuel
and vehicle import and significantly improve productivity as people will
spend less time commuting to and from work.
Among
the elements of an enhanced public transportation system should be safe
school busing; the creation of depots with adequate parking for persons
wishing to park their cars and ride public buses; a high tech WiFi
enabled system that would allow persons to track buses via their cell
phones; and facilitating and encouraging the private construction of a
multi level car garages south of Bay Street to accommodate persons who
work Downtown.
The
pursuit of those initiatives would create hundreds of temporary and
permanent jobs and improve the national wealth of The Bahamas in ways
new roads never could. Economic zones featuring artisans, retailers and
vehicle detailing employing hundreds could be significant adjuncts to
the depots.
One
of the fundamental problems with the road works is that no one has
clearly outlined what the expectations are in terms that we can
understand. Indeed, even the Prime Minister failed to articulate the
benefits of what he called “The transformation and modernization of New
Providence”. For instance, perhaps it would be useful to say that the
road works when completed would reduce travel time by X percent,
assuming that is an objective. It cannot be that the primary purpose of
the road works is just to build and expand roads merely to say we have
“modern roads”. The reality is that the new and expanded roads all
converge at the same bottlenecks. For instance, one can build as many
highways that lead to West Bay Street in the vicinity of Saunders Beach
as one wishes, the unfortunate fact is that all the motorists will wind
up on the same single lane road. In addition, we can extend as many new
roads onto the Eastern Road as we would like, it still will not solve
the traffic problem.
Interestingly,
though not surprisingly, the Prime Minister offered no comment on the
fact that people whose properties were taken in pursuit of road
improvements have not been compensated after many years. These persons
have watched in amazement as the government has overlooked them and
while going out of its way to compensate affluent business owners who
found themselves in similar circumstances.
Furthermore,
while hundreds of small businesses have been affected by the road
works, the government has not acknowledged its legal, moral and
commonsense obligation to compensate them for their losses.
The
Prime Minister talked about building parks throughout New Providence,
yet the overwhelming evidence is that the government has largely
abandoned the existing parks. Whether it’s the park in Seabreeze or
Flamingo Gardens, or Golden Gates, they are all un-kept and in some
cases invite undesirable behaviour.
The
Prime Minister suggested that the rust problem in the Eastern end of
New Providence will be resolved once the 24 inch pipes are replaced on
Robinson Road and Prince Charles. However, that is not true. The fact is
that many of the residents in East are affected by rusty pipes that run
along side streets. It is not until those pipes are replaced that their
problems will be fully resolved. In that regard, Water & Sewerage
should be required to provide residents with a timetable for replacement
of those pipes.
When
this government’s 5 year term ends, they will have spent $1.3 billion
of the Bahamian people’s hard earn money on capital works including
$230,000 (not inclusive of architectural fees) for bathroom facilities
at Saunders Beach. It is up to the Bahamian people to decide if $1.3
billion was money well spent and whether our standard of living
is better as a result. You decide.
Yours truly,
Lindon Nairn